孙艳艳、周波：《从泽田瑞穗藏品看宝卷的分类问题》，《文化遗产》2022年第2期。

【内容摘要】清末民国时期，民间教派为传达教派思想、修行劝善等，通过扶鸾仪式进行人神沟通而创作了一类可称为“扶鸾宝卷”的文本，这类文本也常被视为坛训，但学界对坛训是否归属于宝卷有一定的争议。在对泽田瑞穗藏宝卷进行数据整理时，发现有16 部文本托言神佛所作，无法确切地归入佛教宝卷、教派宝卷或民间故事宝卷。通过对这些文本的细读，本论文认为应将其归入扶鸾宝卷。扶鸾宝卷一方面在教派归属、文本名称、文体特征、说唱性等方面与宝卷关系密切，另一方面应用于多种扶鸾仪式，具备坛训的巫术色彩。可以说扶鸾宝卷是宝卷向坛训演变的过渡形态。对扶鸾宝卷的讨论可以解决我们对泽田藏宝卷进行分类整理时的困惑，同时也为宝卷学界整理和研究相关文本提供参考。

【关键词】泽田瑞穗；扶鸾宝卷；坛训；宗教性

Research on the Baojuan Classification Based On Sawada Mizuho Collection

Sun Yanyan, Zhou Bo

Abstract: During the late Qing and early Republic periods, folk religious sects created a type of text called “Fu Luan Baojuan” to convey their sect’s ideas and promote good deeds, which facilitated communication between humans and gods. These texts are often considered to be “Tan Xun”, but there is some controversy in academia regarding whether they should be classified as Baojuan. During the categorization of the Sawada Mizuho Collection of Baojuan, it was found that 16 of the texts were claimed to be written by Buddhas, making it difficult to classify them as Buddhist Baojuan, sectarian Baojuan, or folk story Baojuan. Through close reading of these texts, this paper argues that they should be classified as Fu Luan Baojuan. On the one hand, Fu Luan Baojuan have a close relationship with Baojuan in terms of sectarian affiliation, text names, literary features, and chantability. On the other hand, they are used in a variety of Fu Luan rituals and have a shamanic coloration similar to Tan Xun. In other words, Fu Luan Baojuan are a transitional form from Baojuan to Tan Xun. The discussion of Fu Luan Baojuan can help us resolve the confusion in categorizing and organizing the Sawada Mizuho Collection of Baojuan, and provide a reference for the Baojuan academic community to categorize and research related texts.

Keywords: Sawada Mizuho, Fu Luan Baojuan, Tan Xun, religiosity.